First Bible Network
First Bible Network

Episode 10 · 1 year ago

Case Closed: The Covid scam has its roots in a New York Times article written 13 years ago


As the World Health Organization finally admits that PCR tests are generating false positives we decided to dig a little deeper and found a New York Times news story that describes "the pandemic that wasn't" and how it was caused by - you guessed it - false PCR results. Thirteen years ago it was an accident but many are saying what's happening now is by design. Listen closely before you get that experimental RNA vaccination.

Links mentioned in the show:

2007 New York Times PCR pandemic news story:

WHO false positives data:

Religious Vaccination Exemption Forms (that you can download now):

Employers can now bar unvaccinated workers, says EEOC:

Bookmark the Right Bible Podcast:


Stripping away two thousand years a false doctrine isn't easy, but we've had lots of coffee. Now your host, Darren Kalamba, and happy Sunday morning to you. This is Darren Klama with another addition of the Right Bible podcast. You know, there's nothing mysterious about the fake covid plague. It already happened in a two thousand and seven New York Times article, and the P under the magician shell is named PCR. That's right, the same PCRP that we have today. And what we're going to do is read it verbatim, this New York Times article, and will have links so you can follow along as we trace everything that's happened back to this single story. Now it doesn't matter if they delete the story from their search engine. We have the original archived in its original format, including the ads, exactly as it appeared in print and on the wet. Now we're also archiving at in our encrypted tour onion sight, just to be safe, because you never know what an unfortunate kayaking accident can happen. Now, the genesis of the scam called covid that's now culminating with you being injected with an experimental and deadly R and a vaccine has its roots in a bizarre story that was first reported on January twenty two, two thousand and seven. Now later, you're going to see how it all ties into the admission from the World Health Organization that PCR tests are being set to artificially create false positives. Let's go back to that story and I guess back in time. The headline reads faith in quick test leads to epidemic that wasn't. And under this thirteen year old headline as a picture of a very concerned looking seated doctor talking to a female patient who's guess what, wearing a mask just like the ones you see today. The story begins Dr Brook Herndon...

...and Internesst to Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, could not stop coughing for two weeks starting in mid April last year. She coughed seemingly non stop, followed by another week when she coughed sporadically, annoying, she said everyone who worked with her before long, Dr Catherine Kirkland, an infectious disease specialist at Dartmouth, had a chilling thought. could she be seeing the start of a whooping cough epidemic. By late April, other healthcare workers at the hospital were coughing, and severe, intractable coughing is a whooping cough hall mark, and if it was whooping cough, the epidemic had to be contained immediately because the disease could be deadly to babies in the hospital and could lead to pneumonia in the frail and vulnerable adult patient there. It was the start of a bizarre episode at the Medical Center. The story of the epidemic that wasn't four months nearly everyone involved thought the Medical Center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak with extensive ramifications nearly onezero healthcare workers at the hospital in Lebanon, New Hampshire. We're given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until the results were in. In one hundred forty two people, including Dr Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care. And by the way, I'm just going to interject quickly here. Does any of this kind of sound familiar to you? Hospital beds taken out of commission vaccines. What do we have? The hospital ships brought in from the military and New York City. This should all be ringing some bells with you as we go through the story, so let's let's go ahead and get back into it. Then, about eight months later, healthcare workers were dumb founded to receive an email...

...message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm. Not a single case of whooping cough was confirmed with a definitive test growing the bacteria in Boord of tell a per tussis in the laboratory. Instead, it appears the healthcare workers were probably afflicted with ordinary respiratory diseases like the common coal now is they look back on the episode, epidemiologists and Infectious Disease Specialists say the problem was that they placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular tests that led them astray. Infectious disease experts say such tests are coming into increasing use and maybe the only way to get a quick answer in diagnosing diseases like whooping cough, lesionaire's bird flu, tuberculosis and stars and deciding whether an epidemic is under way. There are no national data on pseudo epidemics caused by an overreliance on such molecular tests. As Dr Trisham Pearl, and epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins and past President of the Society of Healthcare Epidemiologists of America, but she said pseudo epidemics happen all the time. The Dartmouth case may have been one of the largest, but it was by no means and exception. She said there was a similar whooping cough scaret children's Hospital in Boston last fall that involved thirty six adults and two children. Definitive tests, though, did not find pertussis. It's a problem. We know it's a problem, Dr Pearl said. My guess is that what happened at Dartmouth is going to become more common. Many of the new molecular tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way. These tests, called Home Brews, are not commercially available and there are no good estimates of their error rates. But their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when...

...hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic. You're in a little bit of no man's land with the new molecular test, says Dr Mark Perkins, and Infectious Disease Specialist and chief Scientific Officer at the foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, a nonprofit foundation supported by the bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. All bets are off on exact performance. Of course, that leads to the question of why rely on them at all. At face value, obviously they shouldn't be doing it, Dr Pearl said. But she said often, when answers are needed and an organism like the protessis bacterium is finicky and hard to grow in a laboratory, you don't have great options. Waiting to see if the bacteria grow can take weeks, but the quick molecular test can be wrong. It's almost like you're trying to pick the least of two evils. Dr Pearl said. At Dartmouth did, the decision was to use a test to PCR, for polly Murray's chain reaction. It is a molecular test that until recently was confined to molecular biology laboratories. That's kind of what's happening, said Dr Catherine Edwards. An infectious disease specialist and professor of Pediatrics at Vanderbilt University. That's the reality out there. We're trying to figure out how to use methods that have been the per view of Ben Scientists. The Dartmouth whooping cough story shows what can ensue. To say the episode was disruptive was an understatement, said Dr Elizabeth Talbot, deputy State Epidemiologist for the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services. You cannot imagine, Dr Talbot said. I had a feeling... the time that this gave us a shadow of a hint of what it must be like during a pandemic flu epidemic. Yet epidemiologists say one of the most troubling aspects of the pseudo epidemic is that all the decisions seemed so sensible at the time. Dr Katrina Kreutzinger, a medical epidemiologist at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who worked on the case along with her colleague Dr Minisha Patel, does not fault the Dartmouth doctors. The issue was not that they overreacted or did anything in AP oprey at all at all, Dr Kretsinger said, instead, it is that there is often no way to decide early on whether an epidemic is under way. Before the S we a pertussis vaccine for children was introduced, whooping cough was a leading cause of death and young children. The vaccine led to an eighty percent drop in the diseases incidents, but did not completely eliminate it. That's because the vaccines effectiveness wanes after about a decade and although there is now a new vaccine for adolescence and adults, it is only starting to come into use. Whooping Cough, Dr Kretzinger said, is still a concern. The disease got its name from its most salient feature. Patients may cough and cough and cough until they have to gasp for breath, making us sound like a whoop. The coughing can last so long that one of the common names for whooping cough was the one hundred day cough, Dr Talbot said. But neither coughing long and hard, nor even whooping is unique to pertussis infections, and many people with whooping cough had symptoms like those of the common cold, a running nose or an ordinary cough. Almost everything about the clinical presentation of Pertussis, especially early. Pertussis is not very specific. Dr Kirkland said. That was the first problem in deciding whether...

...there was an epidemic at dark with. The second was with PCR, the quick test to diagnose the disease, Dr Kretzinger said. With Pertussis, she said there are probably one hundred different PCR protocols and methods being used throughout the country and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that, despite the presence of PCR positive results, the disease was not per tussis. Dr Kretzinger added. At Dartmouth, when the first suspect per tussis case emerged and PCR test showed per tusses, doctors believed it. The results seemed completely consistent with the patient symptoms. That's how the whole thing got started. Dr Kirkkins said. Then the doctors decided to test people who did not have severe coughing. Because we had cases where we thought per tussis and because we had vulnerable patients at the hospital, we lowered our threshold. She said. Anyone who had a cough got a PCR test and so did anyone with a running nose who work with high risk patients like infants. That's how we ended up with a hundred thirty four suspect cases, Dr Kirkland said, and that, she added, was why one thousand four hundred forty five healthcare workers ended up taking antibiotics and four thousand five hundred twenty four healthcare workers at the hospital, or seventy two percent of all the healthcare workers there, were then immunized against whooping cough in a matter of days. If we had stopped there, I think we all would have agreed that we had had an outbreak of Pertussis and that we had controlled that, Doctor Kirkland said. But epidemiologists at the hospital in working for the states of New Hampshire and Vermont, decided to take extra steps to confirm what they were really seeing was pertussis. The Dartmouth doctor sent samples from twenty seven patients they thought had pertussis to the state health departments and the Centers for Disease Control.

There scientists tried to grow the bacteria, process that can take weeks. Finally they had their answer. There was no pertussis in any of the samples. We thought. Well, that's odd. Doctor Kirkland said. Maybe it's the timing of the culturing. Maybe it's a transport problem. Why don't we try serological testing? Certainly after a pertussis infection a person should develop antibodies to the bacteria. But they can only get suitable blood samples from thirty nine patients. The others had gotten the vaccine, which itself Elicits pertussis antibodies. But when the Centers for Disease Control tested those thirty nine samples, its scientists reported that only one showed increases in antibody levels indicative of Pertussis. The Disease Center did additional tests as well, including molecular tests to look for features of the pertussis bacteria. It's science tiss also did additional PCR tests on samples from one hundred sixteen of the one hundred thirty four people who were thought to have had whooping cough. Only one PCR was positive, but other tests did not show that the person was infected with pertussis bacteria. The Disease Center also interviewed patients in depth to see what their symptoms were and how they evolved. It was going on for months. Dr Kirkland said, but in the end the conclusion was clear. There was no pertussis epidemic. We were all somewhat surprised, Dr Kirkland said, and we were left in a very frustrating situation about what to do when the next outbreak comes. Dr Cathy, a petty and infectious disease specialist at the University of Utah, said the story had one clear lesson. The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives, Dr Petty said. No single test result is absolute, and that is even more important with a test result based on PCR. As for Dr Herndon,...

...though she now knows she's off the hook, I thought it might have caused the epidemic, she said. Now, with that story fresh in your mind, we're going to look at a statement just released by the World Health Organization regarding PCR tests and false results. Here's a an article taken from the off Guardian Dot Org. The World Health organist station released a guidance memo on December fourteen warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives. While this information is accurate, it is also been available for months, so we must ask why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear that the vaccines work? The Gold Standard Stars cove two tests are based on polymerase chain reaction, or PCR. PCR works by taking nucleotides, tiny fragments of DNA or RNA, and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the cycle threshold or CT value. The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant. This new who memo states that using a highct value to test for the presence of Stars Cove Two will result in false positive results. To quote their own words, users of URTPCR reagents should read the ifu carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold or CET value result being interpreted as a positive result. Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has...

...been paying attention. That PCR tests were easily manipulated and potentially highly inaccurate, has been one of the off repeated battle cries of those of us opposing the pandemic narrative and the policies it's being used to sell. Many articles have been written about it by many experts in the field, medical journalists and other researchers. It's been commonly available knowledge for months now that any test using a CT value over thirty five is potentially meaningless. Dr Carrie Mullus, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn't meant as a diagnostic tool, saying, and I quote, with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. And commenting on cycle thresholds, Mollus also one said if you have to go more than forty cycles to amplify a single copied gene, there's something seriously wrong with your PCR. The mqe guidelines for PCR you state C Q values higher than forty are suspect because of the implied low efficiency and generally should not be reported. Now this has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown. The Australian government's own website admitted the tests were flawed and a cord in Port Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose. Even doctor Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over thirty five is going to be detecting, and I quote, dead Nucleotides, unquote, not a living virus. Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with seat values over thirty five or even into the low forties. So why has the WHO finally decided to say this is wrong? What reason could they have for finally choosing to recognize this simple reality? The answer to that is potentially...

...shockingly cynical. We have a vaccine now, so we don't need false positives any more. Now, notionally, the system has produced its Miracle Cure. So, after everyone has been vaccinated, all the PCR test being done will be done under the new who guidelines and running only twenty five to thirty cycles instead of over thirty five cycles. Low and behold, the number of quote unquote, positive cases will now suddenly plumme it and we will have confirmed that our miracle vaccine works. After months of flooding the data pool with false positives. miscounting death by accident, adding covid nineteen related death to every other death certificate. They can now stop the create a pandemic machine can be turned down to zero again. So, at the end of all this, from the very words of the vaunted New York Times and the world of Health Organization, what do we have? We have an accident from thirteen years ago being weaponized and used in propaganda to vaccinate large portions of the world. And just today the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that employers can bar unvaccinated employees from entering the workplace. Think about that. In other words, this is how they got us from flatten the curve to vaccinate or be fired in under a year, and they did it using the PCR scam. In our next episode we'll take a look at what's actually in this vaccine that they're so excited about injecting you with. I'm Derren Caloma and will see you next time on the right Bible podcast. Derren Klomi here with the right Bible podcast, reminding you that the Cross can also be your shield. Protect yourself with religious exemption affidavits for covid testing, masks and dangerous vaccinations church approved and sanctioned by scripture. Download yours...


In-Stream Audio Search


Search across all episodes within this podcast

Episodes (78)